Uploaded image for project: 'Grouper'
  1. Grouper
  2. GRP-4355

maven checkstyle shouldn't warn on missing javadoc on private fields/methods

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • None
    • 2.5.0
    • None
    • None

    Description

      [WARN] /GIT/grouper/grouper/src/grouper/edu/internet2/middleware/grouper/client/GrouperX509TrustManager.java:51:3: Missing a Javadoc comment. [JavadocVariable]

      It's complaining about private methods and fields. What is the coding standard? I assume it's optional, but do we want checkstyle warning about it?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            chad.redman.3@at.internet2.edu Chad Redman
            chad.redman.3@at.internet2.edu Chad Redman
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: